Skip to main content

3 minutes Read time

A technically correct Policy & Procedure is the basis of any successful Drug and Alcohol Management Program (DAMP).

It should comprise a range of strategies including education / awareness training, employee assistance programs, alcohol and other drug testing and procedures for breach of Policy or Procedure.

Failure to develop a technically correct Policy and Procedure and subsequent failure to adhere to it will invariably cause major issues!!!

  • Whilst a one or two page Policy is ideal, a similar sized Procedure will not address all required components.
  • The Policy and Procedure must be practical and workable in a real environment.
  • This is often an issue when such documents are prepared by lawyers or persons inexperienced with a DAMP.
  • A “patchwork” Policy & Procedure made up of several templates from the internet will rarely be workable in your specific workplace.
  • Does the Policy or Procedure refer to correct Australian Standards, WHS Laws or other Legislation relevant to your industry?
  • Is there a clear and defined alcohol and other drug testing procedure in place?
  • Are there ambiguities or “grey areas” regarding what constitutes a breach of policy?
  • Has your Policy & Procedure been implemented correctly?
  • Staff should sign off and acknowledge the Policy & Procedure before you can enforce it.

So, what are 5 common mistakes in Alcohol and other Drug Policies & Procedures?

1 Use of terms such as “under the influence” or “impairment”. These issues are very difficult, if not impossible, to prove and should not determine a breach of policy or even a general approach to conforming.

2 Failure to adequately define terms used in the Procedure. Absence of a “definitions” section results in ambiguity which leads to “loopholes”.

3 Inconsistency. For example, combining urine and saliva testing in the same procedure when one tests for recent exposure the other tests for historical use.

4 Failure to document the actual testing procedure. For example all testing to be conducted with a nominated independent testing agency with procedures compliant to Australian Standards.

5 Omitting guidelines to manage either prescribed or over the counter medication. These can be managed effectively and satisfactorily with guidelines making up a few paragraphs.

Case Study – Perkins Vs Golden Plains Fodder – South Australia

An employee was dismissed from employment for refusing to submit to a request for a drug test. The matter was referred to the Commissioner who found in favour of the employee.

Employer mistakes included:

  • Policy and Procedure inconsistent and unclear.
  • Rationale referred to impairment rather than fitness for work.
  • Compliance with the Policy and Procedure extended to the conduct of the employees private life which was determined to be “harsh and unreasonable” (Urine testing).
  • The type of testing to be conducted was not defined in the Policy or Procedure.
  • The Drug & Alcohol Policy was “not even understood by its authors who had attempted to elevate it to a purpose it was never able to or intended to achieve”.

“He who fails to plan, plans to fail.”

Winston Churchill
Relevant Drug Testing Solutions

We provide the complete solution for drug and alcohol management within the workplace.

Verified by ExactMetrics